Cases 1 - 10 of 332,669
Ford v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Erica Ford
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Nelson v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05034
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Noah Nelson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kash v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01307
Plaintiff:
Tigran Kash
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CHURCH v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
SHANNON NICHOLE CHURCH
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Haskins, David v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
David M. Haskins
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Allen v. Social Security Administration
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Sharlotte Allen
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Whitmore v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05359
Plaintiff:
Clayton Whitmore
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Andrews v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Sheila Andrews
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
James Allen Lee
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
James Allen Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McPherson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Monte McPherson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
