Cases 1 - 10 of 3,981
SWEATT v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH NEIL SWEATT
Defendant:
BARRY LAVERN LYNCH and CHARLES INGRAM LUMBER CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
Douglas Symmes, Jr. v. NC Department of Public Safety - DPS
as 24-6605
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, -DPS, RONALD COVINGTON, SERGEANT HESTER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
INGRAM v. LOOK OUT LAND HOLDINGS LLC
as 5:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
MARCUS INGRAM
Defendant:
LOOK OUT LAND HOLDINGS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Reid
as 24-1521
Defendant:
DWIGHT REID, CASWELL SENIOR, CHRISTOPHER ERSKINE and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jordan v. Evans et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Stephan W. Jordan
Defendant:
Kenneth G. Evans, Ingram Logging Inc. and Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Ingram v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
Alma T. Ingram
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
INGRAM v. T-ONE LLC
as 5:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
MARCUS INGRAM
Defendant:
T-ONE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dillard v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04396
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Dillard, II
Defendant:
City of Chicago, CW Martin, Jr and M K Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ingram v. Stockearnings, Inc.
as 5:2024cv03201
Plaintiff:
Warren Ingram
Defendant:
Stockearnings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
