Cases 1 - 10 of 2,785
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Lancaster et al v. N.G. Group LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Andra Cheri Rose, Jessica Hinton, Marketa Lim and others
Defendant:
N.G. Group LLC doing business as Babalu, Westwood Buildings Limited Partnership and Does 1 through 5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Lanham Act
MCABEE v. LANCASTER et al
as 1:2024cv01686
Plaintiff:
RONALD COLTON MCABEE
Defendant:
CRYSTAL LANCASTER and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lancaster v. Wilson et al
as 5:2024ct03150
Plaintiff:
Milton E. Lancaster
Defendant:
Mashell L. Wilson, Timothy L. Lewis, Mr. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Daniel James Harper v. F. Flores et al
as 2:2024cv04623
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
F. Flores and CSP Lancaster Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Christopher Seckington
as 24-11848
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTOPHER SECKINGTON
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA, LANCASTER CI WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Symonette et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 8:2024cv01302
Plaintiff:
Maurice Symonette and Mack Wells
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Deutshe Bank National Trust Company and others
Calvin Lynch v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1972
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. LYNCH
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
