Cases 1 - 10 of 2,625
Beasley v. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 1:2024cv03909
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Beasley
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Beasley v. Michael Stores, Inc. d/b/a Michaels Arts and Crafts
as 2:2024cv01140
Plaintiff:
Jerin Beasley
Defendant:
Michael Stores, Inc. d/b/a Michaels Arts and Crafts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Marine Personal Injury
McGhee v. Meaux et al
as 5:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Xavier McGhee
Defendant:
Chief Investigator Danny Meaux, Judge Robert Arnold, Attorney At Law Gus Sermos and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. Edgefield Mailroom Clerks et al
as 4:2024cv02597
Plaintiff:
Charlton Beasley
Defendant:
Edgefield Mailroom Clerks, Edgefield Correctional Institution, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Omar et al (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Ellu M. Omar, Demetrius M. Wallace, Jerren R. Pack and others
Defendant:
Diggins, Line, Bruning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY, Warden SHAWN EMMONS, Warden BRIAN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01602
Plaintiff:
Renee Beasley
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
