Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12,206
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff: Khor Chin Lim
Defendant: New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00971
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03677
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bennett et al v. TestMax, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03662
Plaintiff: Alvoid Bennett and Regine Urcia
Defendant: TestMax, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boards v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff: Carl R Webb II Boards and Carl Roy Webb II Boards
Defendant: Loren, Arron Smith, Brian English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Bennett v. Bayer Corporation, et al
as 24-1807
Plaintiff: CHARLES BENNETT
Defendant: BAYER CORP, An Indiana Corporation, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, a New Jersey Corporation, MERCK & CO INC, a New Jersey Corporation and others
Corbray v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05332
Petitioner: Dennis Derise Corbray
Respondent: Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bennett v. Cooper et al
as 1:2024cv03549
Plaintiff: Roosevelt Bennett
Defendant: Jerri Cooper, Marin Share, Dawn R. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01254
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Smart v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2024ct03100
Plaintiff: Michael Trevor Smart
Defendant: S. Hawkins, Associate Warden Bennett, Sergeant Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?