Cases 1 - 10 of 4,507
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01637
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ackerman et al v. Arkema Inc.
as 4:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Ackerman, Mary Ackerman, Sylbestre Aburto and others
Defendant:
Arkema Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01258
Plaintiff:
ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER, COLUMBIA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, GLEN FALLS HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tatum v. Criaye et al
as 3:2024cv01183
Plaintiff:
Bobby Tatum
Defendant:
C/O Criage, Lt. Bradford, Lt Auston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 7:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Chase Hunter Bradford
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Snedeker v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1173
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD WAYNE SNEDEKER, SR.
Defendant:
STATE OF COLORADO, ANJALI NANDI, DENISE MERTZ and others
Palmer et al v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Courtney Palmer and Shaunta Bradford
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Sellers v. Macdill et al
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Zachary Wade Sellers
Defendant:
Justin Macdill, Carol Bradford, Chris Carr and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
