Cases 1 - 10 of 478
Norman v. City of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
April Norman
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Sheryl Long, Art Dahlberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephen Durr v. State of Illinois, et al
as 24-1939
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DURR
Defendant:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
DURR v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03141
Plaintiff:
EMILE DURR
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGMENT, LLC and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Canoy v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Connie Canoy
Defendant:
United States of America and Gwendolyn Durr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Keith Durr v. Wayne County, MI, et al
as 24-1253
Plaintiff:
KEITH LARON DURR
Defendant:
WAYNE COUNTY, MI, WARREN C. EVANS, Wayne County Executive and KYM L. WORTHY, Wayne County Prosecutor
Durr v. Nautic Partners, LLC
as 1:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Allison Durr
Defendant:
Nautic Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Durr v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Daniel Durr
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Durr v. Slator
as 24-71
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JERRY DURR
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY, NEW YORK and AARON SILVERMAN
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL SLATOR, in his individual capacity and official capacity as a Police Officer, WILLIAM CLARK and CITY OF ONEIDA, NEW YORK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
