Cases 11 - 20 of 460
Amber Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 2:2023cv06439
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Goodwin v. Unum Group et al
as 2:2023cv01546
Plaintiff:
Scott C Goodwin
Defendant:
Unum Group and Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 9:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Amber Baptiste
Defendant:
Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Goodwin v. Cellular Sales
as 2:2023cv01176
Plaintiff:
Antonio Goodwin
Defendant:
Cellular Sales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Goodwin
as 23-1518
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES C GOODWIN, III
James Goodwin, III v. USA
as 23-35492
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES CLIFFORD GOODWIN III
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Goodwin v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08499
Plaintiff:
John C Goodwin
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tito Vasquez v. Friar Tux Orange et al
as 8:2023cv00741
Plaintiff:
Tito Vasquez
Defendant:
FRIAR TUX ORANGE, MICHAEL K MESKELL, MESKELL, GOODWIN & MESKELL, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Temple v. Action Water Sports of Incline Village, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00759
Plaintiff:
Laura Temple
Defendant:
Action Water Sports of Incline Village, LLC, Gary Scott, David Ceruti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Glacier Bear Retreat, LLC, et al v. Matt Dusek, et al
as 23-35268
Appellant:
GLACIER BEAR RETREAT, LLC, GAIL L. GOODWIN and DARRYL C. SLATTENGREN
Counter Claimant:
MATT DUSEK and RACHEL DUSEK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
