Cases 1 - 10 of 3,126
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Hays v. Hooper
as 3:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Cameron Hays
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Hays v. Marion County Sheriff
as 24-1693
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. HAYS
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF
Hays v. Platte County et al
as 1:2024cv00087
Defendant:
Platte County Sheriff, Jordyn Pearson, Cody Keller and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Hays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gregson v. City of San Marcos et al
as 1:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
John Gregson
Defendant:
City of San Marcos, Hays County, Officer John Reeder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ma et al v. Mountain Frontier LLC
as 2:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Chao Mei Ma, Chao Ying Ma, Jian Hua Huan and others
Defendant:
Mountain Frontier LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Banks v. McGlynn, Hays & Co., Inc.
as 24-895
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BANKS
Defendant:
MCGLYNN, HAYS & CO., INC., GERARD CARLUCCI, Individually, JOSEPH I. CRINCOLI, Individually and others
Le v. Hartford, City of, et al
as 1:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Hai Quoc Le, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Hartford and Tressa Beltran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Alabama State Conference of the NAACP et al v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Alabama State Conference of the NAACP, League of Women Voters of Alabama, League of Women Voters of Alabama Education Fund and others
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, William R Adair, T Kirke Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
