Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2026cv01679
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramos v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
as 1:2026cv08112
Plaintiff:
Jordan Ramos
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv12292
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Delapaz v. Warden, Telford Unit et al
as 5:2026cv00152
Plaintiff:
Jordan Delapaz
Defendant:
Warden, Telford Unit, Ranking Officers of the Telford Unit, Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. MOYER et al
as 2:2026cv07198
Plaintiff:
JORDAN WILSON
Defendant:
BRETT MOYER, NATHANIEL T BRADLEY, KIMBERLY BRISKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Burnett v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv02366
Plaintiff:
Jordan Burnett
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
NARANJO v. TRUTT et al
as 1:2026cv02655
Plaintiff:
Isaac Naranjo
Defendant:
C/O Trutt, Officers Lucas and A. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Frizzell et al v. Warden of the Telford Unit et al
as 5:2026cv00125
Plaintiff:
Jason Frizzell, Auqeis Harper, Darrian Johnson and others
Defendant:
Warden of the Telford Unit, Ranking Officers of the Telford Unit, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan Aulizio v. Sean Whitehouse
as 26-3836
Plaintiff:
JORDAN P. AULIZIO
Defendant:
SEAN WHITEHOUSE, In his individual capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
