Cases 1 - 10 of 658
Hunt v. Noeth
as 24-1094
Plaintiff:
CLIFTON HUNT
Defendant:
PATRICIA CIULLA, Deputy Warden for Attica Correctional Facility, JOSEPH H. NOETH, Warden for Attica Correctional Facility, JOHN/JANE DOES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Padma Rao v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 24-1347
Plaintiff:
PADMA RAO
Defendant:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and KIEFER KRAUSE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Dawes v. The People of the State of California et al
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
William Orren Dawes
Defendant:
The People of the State of California, Rob Bonta, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RAO Construction, LLC v. Ed Lunn Construction, Inc.
as 0:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
ROA Construction, LLC and RAO Construction, LLC
Defendant:
Ed Lunn Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
SRI PETROLEUM CORP. et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
SRI PETROLEUM CORP. A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION doing business as SUNOCO A-PLUS and SRINIVAS RAO SRIKOTI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gubbala v. Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co.
as 2:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Srinivasa Rao Gubbala
Defendant:
Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
