Cases 11 - 20 of 16,526
Washington v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq01190
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Washington
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peterkin v. Carr
as 24-1148
Plaintiff:
MEURIS PETERKIN
Defendant:
DOUGLAS CARR, JOSE ALBARRACIN, TAMARA WILLIAMS and others
Armstrong v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11150
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Armstrong
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Armstrong v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Armstrong
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wrobleski v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Wrobleski
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Arvizu et al
as 2:2024cv03576
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Arvizu
Defendant:
Los Angeles Police Department and Los Angeles Dodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campos et al v. Arizona Board of Regents et al
as 2:2024cv00987
Plaintiff:
Aida Esmeralda Campos, Amy O'Neill, Autumn Byars and others
Defendant:
Arizona Board of Regents a constitutionally created body corporate doing business as Arizona State University and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee Ann McKay v. Thomas G. Bruton, et al
as 24-1744
Petitioner:
LEE ANN MCKAY
Respondent:
THOMAS G. BRUTON and REBECCA R. PALLMEYER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wintrode v. Captain Hughes, et al.
as 1:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Joshwa Aaron Wintrode
Defendant:
Captain Hughes, Sgt. Ron Owen, Deputy Rebecca Coffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
