Cases 1 - 10 of 427
Perdomo v. City of League City, Texas et al
as 3:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Yoni Orli Perdomo
Defendant:
City of League City, Texas, City of League City Police Department, Officer Trevor Rector and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
McKoy v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Ronald McKoy
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, Raleigh Police Department and Tanner C. Goss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
232 West Mason LLC v. Jackson, City of, et al
as 5:2024cv11051
Plaintiff:
232 W MASON LLC
Defendant:
City of Jackson, a municipal corporation, Matthew Hagerty, Mark M. Porterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Moyle v. City of Princeton, Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Mark Moyle
Defendant:
City of Princeton, Texas, Derek Borg and Brianna Chacon
Intervenor:
Matthew Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Riley v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01567
Plaintiff:
Cordero Riley
Defendant:
Clayton County, Georgia, Jeffrey Turner, Alieka Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Drake v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System Inc, Molly Smith, Arthur William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Owens v. King County et al
as 2:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Tanner Owens
Defendant:
King County, Patti Cole-Tindall and Jesse Anderson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
