Cases 21 - 30 of 178,092
Montgomery v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02091
Petitioner:
Louvertis Kayonne Montgomery
Respondent:
Warden Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Stumpf v. Maier
as 6:2024cv06276
Plaintiff:
Nicholas B. Stumpf
Defendant:
Honorable Martin Maier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Hernandez v. Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc. d/b/a Dollar General
as 5:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Christine Hernandez
Defendant:
Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc. d/b/a Dollar General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Commonwealth Equity Services, LLC
as 24-1427
Plaintiff:
US SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH EQUITY SERVICES, LLC, d/b/a Commonwealth Financial Network
Interested Party:
FINANCIAL SERVICES INSTITUTE, INC.
Bannikov v. Garland
as 24-1202
Petitioner:
PAVEL BANNIKOV, NIKOLAI BANNIKOV, LIUBOV BANNIKOVA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sava v. Garland
as 24-1192
Petitioner:
PAMELA SAVA, SALAJAN SAVA and DAVID SAVA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Frank Reid v. Corizon Health Services
as 24-6422
Plaintiff:
FRANK REID
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, Virginia Department of Corrections Contract Medical Provider, J. BLEDSOE, Red Onion State Prison Medical Administrator, DOCTOR FOX, Red Onion State Prison Physician and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
