Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Coleman v. Charles et al
as 3:2023cv01581
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Coleman
Defendant:
Sandra Charles, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kerr v. Morgan et al
as 1:2023cv01926
Plaintiff:
John M. Kerr
Defendant:
Kathryn Peifer Morgan, Esq., Barbara E. Griffin, Esq., George P. Hartwick, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
COLEMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12391
Plaintiff:
SEAN W COLEMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COLEMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09392
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W. COLEMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. COLEMAN
as 2:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
JOSHUA W. COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Jones v. Wheeling et al
as 5:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Xavier Lee Jones
Defendant:
Linda Wheeling, Castro Raul, W. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Fitch v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
Lamont Fitch
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Christopher Wray, Director Michael Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
UMB Bank, N.A. v. Coleman
as 4:2022cv00550
Plaintiff:
UMB Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Michael W Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
McMillan v. United States Department of Justice
as 2:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Peter A McMillan
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, United States Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coleman v. Cunningham et al
as 3:2021cv01392
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Coleman
Defendant:
Cunningham, Carlos Nunez and Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
