Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Easom v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11985
Plaintiff:
Bradley D. Easom
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc., COVIDIEN, LTD., Covidien Plc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Easom v. US Well Service
as 21-20202
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Nau, Adrian Howard and Scott Easom
Defendant / Appellee:
US Well Services, Incorporated
Easom v. US Well Services
as 21-90010
Respondent:
US Well Services, Incorporated
Petitioner:
Scott Easom, Adrian Howard and John Nau
Easom v. US Well Services, Inc.
as 4:2020cv02995
Plaintiff:
Scott Easom, John Nau and Adrian Howard
Defendant:
US Well Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Mason v. Ownery et al
as 5:2019cv00068
Defendant:
Wendy Kelly, Ownery, Easom and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Western Heritage Insurance Company v. Easom et al
as 2:2017cv02035
Plaintiff:
Western Heritage Insurance Company
Defendant:
Greg Easom , Calvin Weatherly and Louanne Weatherly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Easom v. Allied World National Assurance Company/Broadspire et al
as 7:2016cv00419
Plaintiff:
Marriann Easom
Defendant:
Allied World National Assurance Company/Broadspire and Worldwide Language Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Easom v. Cain et al
as 5:2016cv00251
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Easom
Defendant:
Nathan B Cain, II and Avoyelles Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Easom v. Worldwide Language Resources, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00663
Plaintiff:
Marriann Easom
Defendant:
Worldwide Language Resources, Inc. and Allied World National Assurance Company/Broadspire
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Easom v. Worldwide Language Resources, Inc. et al - DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - SEE 5:15-CV-663-F
as 7:2015cv00267
Plaintiff:
Marriann Easom
Defendant:
Worldwide Language Resources, Inc. and Allied World National Assurance Company/Broadspire
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
