Cases 1 - 10 of 603
United States v. Damion Hallmon
as 24-1837
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Damion Kent Hallmon, also known as Damion Kent Adam Leona Hallmon, also known as Damion Kale Hallmon, also known as Damien Kent Hallmon, also known as Damion Kent Hallman, also known as Damion Kale Hallman, also known as Dee X, also known as Daniel K
Mahmoud v. Navarrete et al
as 2:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
Jose Navarrete, William Hutchings, Jeniffer Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hallman v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Stanley Wilson Hallman
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hallman v. USA
as 4:2024cv00198
Petitioner:
Joshua Lamar Hallman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hallman v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Robert F Hallman
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Detective McKee FNU, Ashlea Deener and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00137
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Leroy Wells v. John Roberts, et al
as 24-5021
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Defendant:
John Roberts, Chief Justice United States Supreme Court, D.S.G., U.S.D.C.D. Or. Pendleton Division; Clerk, John Does, U.S.D.C.D. Or. Pendleton Division; Clerks and others
Hallman v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HALLMAN
Defendant:
WARDEN OTIS SMITH, JONES and SABRINA PORTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
