Cases 61 - 70 of 6,690
M. et al v. Azar et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Michaela M., Gabriel M., Kinley G. and others
Defendant:
Stephanie M. Azar and Jean W. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILES v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00203
Petitioner:
BARBARA MILES
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Griggs v. 20 Mile Road Parker CO LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Shana Griggs
Defendant:
20 Mile Road Parker CO LLC, Thompson Thrift Development Inc. and Thompson Thrift Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brough v. Gallaway et al
as 3:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Maurice Brough
Defendant:
Warden Gallaway, C/O White, Lt. Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILES v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
RYAN L. MILES
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Banshu v. Edouard et al
as 1:2024cv01105
Plaintiff:
Kahusia J. Banshu
Defendant:
Sergeant Williem Edouard, Lieutenant Toussaint, Supervisor B. Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SSR Miracle Mile LLC v. Robert Ambuehl et al
as 2:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
SSR Miracle Mile LLC
Defendant:
Robert Ambuehl and Emmanuel Dostaly
Allen v. McFarlane
as 1:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
Miles Johnathan Allen
Defendant:
Andrew McFarlane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams and Miles
Defendant:
City of Chicago, John Doe, Director to get names of Doctor's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Arthur Miles
as 24-1186
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ARTHUR MILES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
