Cases 31 - 40 of 26,233
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Darden v. Luechtefeld et al
as 4:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Dominique Deangelo Darden
Defendant:
Debra Luechtefeld, Kyle Clinkingbeard, Valerie Huhn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guillot v. Wade
as 24-30247
Plaintiff:
Dylan Guillot
Defendant:
Warden Wade, Asst Warden Dear, Deputy Warden Cupp and others
Zarfati et al v. Artsana USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv21372
Plaintiff:
Lexi Leigh Zarfati, Michelle Williams, Jordana Morris and others
Defendant:
Artsana USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Rush v. Helfrich et al
as 1:2024cv02971
Plaintiff:
Dennis Rush
Defendant:
Bryan Helfrich, Brandon Walls, David Haag and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ricks v. Weiser, et al
as 24-1141
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALLEN RICKS, SHANEL MOSSMAN, TIFFANY BALLAIN and others
Defendant:
PHILIP WEISER, JARED POLIS and ALL COUNTY JAILS AND COURTS OF COLORADO STATEWIDE
Lucas v. Kelley et al
as 9:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
London Lucas and London H. Lucas
Defendant:
Kelley, Dr. Macri, RN Napoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Morris v. NC Education Lottery et al
as 3:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Charles Morris, Jr.
Defendant:
NC Education Lottery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
