Cases 1 - 10 of 1,685
Allen v. Jackson
as 4:2024cv02899
Petitioner:
Earnest Maurice Allen, Earnest Maurice Pickett and Ernest Maurice Allen
Respondent:
Warden Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albert Pickett, Jr., et al v. City of Cleveland, OH
as 24-3395
Plaintiff:
ALBERT PICKETT, JR., KEYONNA JOHNSON, JAROME MONTGOMERY and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH
Amicus Curiae:
NORTHEAST OHIO REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT
Pickett v. 600 Carnahan Drive Operations, LLC
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Queenetta Pickett
Defendant:
600 Carnahan Drive Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pickett v. Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
as 4:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Robert Pickett
Defendant:
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Benjamin Watson, Jr., et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 24-11310
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN WATSON, JR., SHEILA WILEMON WATSON, SHANE WALTERS and others
Defendant:
KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA
Hall v. Boyle et al
as 2:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
Kenya Hall
Defendant:
Chris Boyle, Grace Moran, Karissa Kurrier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duarte v. Bridgewater State Hospital, et al
as 24-1387
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. DUARTE
Defendant:
BRIDGEWATER STATE HOSPITAL, WELLPATH LLC, CAROL A. MICI, Commissioner, Department of Correction and others
Pickett v. Department of Homeland Security
as 4:2024cv01476
Plaintiff:
Rose Pickett
Defendant:
DHS Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Pittman v. Pickett, et al
as 24-1153
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL PITTMAN
Defendant:
PICKETT, C/O, FONTEROT, C/O, PLATO, C/O and others
Peyton v. Kibler, et al.
as 24-2363
Plaintiff:
LEE EDWARD PEYTON
Defendant:
BRIAN KIBLER, J. PICKETT, R. PEERY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
