Cases 1 - 10 of 1,106
Evatt v. Simbeck et al
as 3:2025cv05162
Plaintiff:
Scott Emerson Evatt
Defendant:
Paul Simbeck, Kirk Medina and Brandon Avalos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lujano-Avalos v. United States Of America
as 1:2025cv00034
Petitioner:
Carlos Lujano-Avalos
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
(PC) Simpkins v. Delacruz et al
as 1:2025cv00249
Plaintiff:
Maureece Simpkins
Defendant:
Armando Delacruz, Vicent Escobedo, Robert Cesena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Simpkins v. Delacruz et al
as 2:2025cv00618
Plaintiff:
Maureece Simpkins
Defendant:
Armando Delacruz, Vicent Escobedo, Robert Cesena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avalos v. De Vinci's Pizza, Inc et al
as 2:2025cv00250
Plaintiff:
Maricruz Avalos
Defendant:
De Vinci's Pizza, Inc and John A. Decastro Day
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Fitzgerald v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2025cv02164
Plaintiff:
Willie Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail and DRT FNU Avalos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv10268
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Avalos v. Sig Sauer, Inc.
as 2:2025cv00451
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Avalos
Defendant:
Sig Sauer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fitzgerald v. Shelby County Jail
as 2:2025cv02087
Plaintiff:
Willie Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail and DRT FNU Avalos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
