Cases 1 - 10 of 160
Hainline v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Joshua Blake Hainline
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Blake v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Linda W. Blake
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Blake v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Blake
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Blake Andrew Keyes v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Blake Andrew Keyes
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Eriksen v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Blake J. Eriksen
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
LAROQUE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv21263
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BLAKE LAROQUE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
LAROQUE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2023cv21263
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BLAKE LAROQUE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lacich Cole v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv02914
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Blake Lacich Cole
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Blake v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Christopher Blake
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Hairston v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
Blake Goode Hairston, III
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
