Cases 1 - 10 of 2,764
Boards v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Carl R Webb II Boards and Carl Roy Webb II Boards
Defendant:
Loren, Arron Smith, Brian English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delacruz v. The United States Of America
as 4:2024cv01659
Petitioner:
Andrew Blake Delacruz
Respondent:
The United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Reese v. Huggins et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Cedric Anthony Reese
Defendant:
Thomas Huggins and Blake Turman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Wills
as 3:2024cv01145
Petitioner:
Blake D Wilson
Defendant:
Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vaughn v. Maness et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Clarence Vaughn
Defendant:
Blake Maness, John Michael Hill, David Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. TDCJ Director Bobby Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
Aaron Blake Wood
Respondent:
TDCJ Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mayon v. Giour
as 6:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Raven Mayon
Defendant:
Blake Giour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTSON v. PFURSICH
as 2:2024cv01488
Petitioner:
AARON BLAKE ROBERTSON
Respondent:
JACQUELYN E. PFURSICH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mojica v. Jirasek et al
as 1:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Dean Anthony Mojica
Defendant:
Blake Jirasek, Brian Connolly, Dee McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoffman et al v. Pirc et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Hoffman, Joseph F. Laffey, Blake Huffman and others
Defendant:
Ken Pirc, Tracy Dietsch, Anne Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
