Cases 1 - 10 of 845
Compton v. Conner et al
as 5:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Rodney C. Compton
Defendant:
J. Conner, A. Ross and FCI-Beckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BROWN v. DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2024cv01666
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, PA. DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONNER v. LANDRY
as 1:2024cv01208
Plaintiff:
ALBERTUS CONNER, JR.
Defendant:
JEFF LANDRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. USA
as 1:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Daniel Dewayne Conner
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Ian Conners
as 24-6364
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
IAN CONNERS, FBOP Central Office Inmate Appeal Administrator
Conner v. Warden et al
as 1:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
John Henry Conner, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden, Merick Garland and Colet Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Conner v. Warden Caddo Correctional
as 24-30248
Petitioner:
Albertus Conner, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Caddo Correctional Center
HILL v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE HILL
Defendant:
WARDEN RANDY IRWIN, LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, SERGEANT J.T. KRAFCZYNSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* Albertus Conner, Jr
Defendant:
Caddo Correctional Center and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
