Cases 1 - 10 of 925
GUILLEN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00627
Petitioner:
JUSTINE GUILLEN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
KARAMIAN v. BR BROTHERS TRUCKING LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00946
Plaintiff:
SHANT KARAMIAN
Defendant:
BR BROTHERS TRUCKING, LLC, XIMA TRANSPORTATION CORP., JEFRY LOPEZ-GUILLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Guillen-Candelas v. Garland
as 24-9509
Petitioner:
MIGUEL GUILLEN-CANDELAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Hercules Flores et al v. City of Independence, Missouri
as 4:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Elvia C Hercules Flores and Mauricio A. Guerra Guillen
Defendant:
City of Independence, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Tyrece Jefferson v. G. Guillen et al
as 2:2024cv00972
Plaintiff:
Tyrece Jefferson
Defendant:
K. Guillen and C. Lomeli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores Guillen, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1391
Petitioner:
LESLY SUCELY FLORES GUILLEN and JOSE ANGEL LUCERO FLORES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
