Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 468
Hurley v. TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00155
Petitioner: Freddy Hurley
Respondent: Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blackwell v. Stiltner et al
as 7:2024cv00271
Plaintiff: Matthew Don Blackwell
Defendant: T. Joseph Stiltner, Jack S. Hurley, Jr. and Unknown Court Evaluator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurley v. Stover
as 3:2024cv00593
Petitioner: Ashley Hurley
Respondent: R. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hurley Jackson v. USA
as 24-1500
Petitioner: HURLEY C. JACKSON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff: MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant: EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor: TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
Smith v. Casey et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff: Jasmone Kausvas Smith
Defendant: Dr. Joseph P. Casey, Colonel Jeffrey S. Katz, S.M. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Hinthorne et al
as 3:2024cv03027
Plaintiff: Rodney Love
Defendant: Cherryle Hinthorne, Clayton Stephenson, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latham v. Hurley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv10130
Plaintiff: Lincoln Latham
Defendant: Tina Hurley, Charlene Bonner, Tonomey Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurley v. Bennett We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv06091
Petitioner: Richard Lee Hurley and Ricky
Respondent: Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Gilley et al
as 6:2023cv00191
Plaintiff: Kenneth A. Jones
Defendant: Warden Gilley, J. Hutson, Larry Monhollen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?