Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Terry Ofori v. C. Long
as 26-6777
Plaintiff:
TERRY K. OFORI
Defendant:
C. LONG, M. D. POWERS, MR. RUTLEDGE and others
Dixon et al v. City of Montgomery, Alabama et al
as 2:2026cv00578
Plaintiff:
Cephus Dixon and Charolette Clark
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Alabama, Orien McCray and Clarance Provo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Randy Lassiter, Jr. v. Correctional Officer Blevins
as 26-6757
Plaintiff:
RANDY LEE LASSITER, JR.
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BLEVINS, NURSE CRYSTAL GILLEY, "Pill Call Nurse", LIEUTENANT COLEMAN and others
Eng v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2026cv07163
Plaintiff:
Martin Lee Eng
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Darren McCray, Michael M. Bordessa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Thompson v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2026cv24650
Plaintiff:
Herbert Thompson
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County, T. Slocum, L. Redding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Copeland v. McCray et al
as 1:2026cv00803
Plaintiff:
Darrel L. Copeland
Defendant:
McCray, Eric Carroll, Brian Emig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCRAY v. USPS et al
as 2:2026cv01409
Plaintiff:
MILDRED I. MCCRAY
Defendant:
USPS and NALC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acceptance Insurance Indemnity Company v. Forrester Apartments, LLC et al
as 7:2026cv01128
Plaintiff:
Acceptance Insurance Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Forrester Apartments, LLC, Tina Blair, Andrea Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
MCCRAY v. RUSSO et al
as 5:2026cv00176
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LEE MCCRAY
Defendant:
J RUSSO, J CORDER, I KENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.