Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Randolph v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2022cv03952
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dale Randolph
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Robinson v. U.S. Air Force et al
as 5:2019cv01107
Defendant:
Department of Labor (Dallas, TX), Randolph AFB (San Antonio, TX), Department of Labor (Washington, DC) E.C.A.B. and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Robinson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Michel v. Long Island Rail Road Company
as 1:2019cv00261
Plaintiff:
Randolph Michel
Defendant:
Long Island Rail Road Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Bernes et al v. ChildNet et al
as 0:2018cv61019
Plaintiff:
Monique Barnes, J.D. and W.W.
Defendant:
ChildNet, Jeanette Randolph, Leslie Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NORRIS v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 1:2014cv00830
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH NORRIS
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Randolph v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2011cv00801
Plaintiff:
Leroy Randolph
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Randolph v. B & K Group Inc et al
as 3:2010cv00135
Plaintiff:
Richard Randolph
Defendant:
B & K Group Inc and BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
RANDOLPH v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
as 2:2010cv01419
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RANDOLPH
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
RANDOLPH v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv00560
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND RANDOLPH
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Beck v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00001
Plaintiff:
Randolph K. Beck
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
