Cases 1 - 10 of 2,053
Salas v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00394
Plaintiff:
Jamila M. Salas
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Canales v. Rayford et al
as 5:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Canales
Defendant:
Senior Warden Phonso J. Rayford, Correctional Officer Vanessa Valero, Correctional Officer Ruth Trice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
USA v. Ruiz-Salas
as 24-50457
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Hector Manuel Ruiz-Salas
US v. Ahmed Burale
as 24-6546
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AHMED SALA ALI BURALE, a/k/a Ahmed Salah Ali, Ahmed Hindi, Ahmed Salah Ali Burle
RYBINSKI et al v. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2024cv06706
Plaintiff:
MICHAL RYBINSKI, YASID MAURICIO SALAS RESTREPO, LUKASZ WNUK and others
Defendant:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Wilson v. M & J Trucking Inc et al
as 3:2024cv01351
Plaintiff:
Shalonna Katrice Wilson
Defendant:
M & J Trucking Inc and Saul O Salas-Hudiel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Scott v. United States Postal Service (U.S.P.S.), et al
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Juan Salas Scott
Defendant:
United States Postal Service (U.S.P.S), Department of Labor (D.O.L) and Concentra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Salas v. Horton, et al
as 24-2084
Petitioner:
PAUL STEPHEN SALAS
Respondent:
VINCENT HORTON, Warden and HECTOR BALDERAS, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
