Cases 11 - 20 of 27,873
Johnson (PS) v. Keller et al
as 1:2024cv01361
Plaintiff:
Walter Johnson
Defendant:
Keller and A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davison v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Gabriel Davison
Defendant:
Clifford J Smith, Scott Rowland, Robert L Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Megna v. Anclam et al
as 1:2024cv00588
Plaintiff:
Walter Joseph Megna
Defendant:
Jeremy Anclam and John Musial
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walters v. Medical Staff RRJ et al
as 2:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Russell Odell Walters
Defendant:
Medical Staff RRJ, Security Staffing RRJ and Dr. Ronald Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Tewalt
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Walter B. Martin
Defendant:
Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Correia et al v. Martine Travelift, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Joshua J. Correia and Katie M. Micheletti
Defendant:
Marine Travelift, Inc., RKL Solutions Inc. doing business as Martin Walter Company, Preco Electronics, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Parks v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 6:2024cv02956
Plaintiff:
Walter Parks, Jr
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Wardlaw et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02300
Plaintiff:
Walter A. Wardlaw and Karla J. Wardlaw
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
