Cases 21 - 30 of 687
(HC) Santa Cruz v. Warden
as 2:2023cv00940
Petitioner:
Enio Zaragoza Santa Cruz
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
USA v. Tapia-Zaragoza
as 23-10432
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Lucas Tapia-Zaragoza
(PC) Davila v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00646
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Davila
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons, Rex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
United States v. Abel Miranda-Diaz
as 23-1698
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Abel Miranda-Diaz, also known as Baldemar Rodriguez-Zaragoza, also known as Luis Rodriguez-Vega, also known as El Jefe, also known as El General, also known as Micho
Mitchell Garraway v. Jacquiline Ciufo, et al
as 23-15482
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MITCHELL GARRAWAY
Defendant / Appellant:
JACQUILINE CIUFO, K. MILLER and J. ZARAGOZA
Zaragoza v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 7:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Elias Zuniga Zaragoza
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-50194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Reyes et al v. Reed's Metals of Benton AR Inc et al
as 4:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Mateo Reyes and Maricela Zaragoza
Defendant:
Reed's Metals of Benton AR Inc, Reed's Metals LLC and Dennis Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Daniel Zaragoza v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00076
Petitioner:
Daniel Zaragoza
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
HARRIS v. GARCIA-ZARAGOZA
as 2:2022cv04728
Plaintiff:
JAMES HARRIS
Defendant:
MARTIN GARCIA-ZARAGOZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
