Cases 1 - 10 of 100
A.M. v. G6 Hospitality Property LLC
as 9:2026cv00973
Defendant:
G6 Hospitality Property LLC
Plaintiff:
A.M.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv09257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Moraes da Silva, et al v. Blanche
as 26-2182
Petitioner:
IVANILDA MORAES DA SILVA and A.M.
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07891
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Government of Canada v. US
as 27-1026
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, GOVERNMENT OF ALBERTA, GOVERNMENT OF QUEBEC and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, SIERRA PACIFIC INDUSTRIES and COMMITTEE OVERSEEING ACTION FOR LUMBER INTERNATIONAL TRADE INVESTIGATIONS OR NEGOTIATIONS
Hyndman v. City of New Rochelle
as 26-2856
Defendant:
TONY DACOSTA GREENIDGE, BELINDA NUNEZ, CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE and others
Plaintiff:
DANTE A. HYNDMAN
McFarlin et al v. The Michaels Organization, LLC et al
as 8:2026cv03041
Plaintiff:
Shawn McFarlin, Gia McFarlin, A.M. and others
Defendant:
The Michaels Organization, LLC, AMC East Communities, LLC and MMS Air Force, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Kierun v. Z2M HALL STREET, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv06360
Plaintiff:
Rafal Kierun
Defendant:
Z2M HALL STREET, LLC, EUGENE SITERMAN, HHI TECH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07180
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
