Cases 1 - 10 of 100
A.M. v. YouTube, LLC et al
as 4:2026cv10596
Plaintiff:
A.M.
Defendant:
YouTube, LLC and Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
A.M.09 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv10481
Plaintiff:
A.M.09
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
A.M.08 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv10270
Plaintiff:
A.M.08
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
A.M.07 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv10258
Plaintiff:
A.M.07
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In Re: Dante A. Hyndman
as 26-2497
Respondent:
TONY DACOSTA GREENIDGE, BELINDA NUNEZ, WESTCHESTER COUNTY and others
Petitioner:
DANTE A. HYNDMAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
A.M. v. BEECH-NUT NUTRITION COMPANY et al
as 5:2026cv00240
Plaintiff:
A.M.
Defendant:
BEECH-NUT NUTRITION COMPANY, CAMPBELL'S COMPANY, GERBER PRODUCTS COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
A.M. v. Boston West Hospitality LLC et al
as 1:2026cv13996
Plaintiff:
A.M.
Defendant:
Boston West Hospitality LLC, Holiday Hospitality Franchising, LLC and Twin Tier Hospitality, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
A.M.03 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv09213
Plaintiff:
A.M.03
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barzee v. Abdulla
as 26-2338
Plaintiff:
SAIO BARZEE
Defendant:
Sing Sing Correctional Officer A.M. ABDULLA, Sing Sing Correctional Officer E. TORRES, Sing Sing Correctional Officer V. SANTIAGO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
