Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Patterson v. Lucas et al
as 3:2025cv03166
Plaintiff:
Andre Patterson and Janiah Monroe
Defendant:
. Bartel, Kayla Lucas and Adam Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Engelage v. Cox
as 4:2021cv01143
Plaintiff:
Kirk Engelage
Defendant:
Adam Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Diana Mey v. DIRECTV, LLC
as 21-1274
Defendant:
AC1 COMMUNICATIONS, a DirecTV Authorized Dealer, and its principal Adam Cox, MICHAEL ASGHARI, KREATAMOTIVE LLC, a DirecTV Authorized Dealer and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RUSSELL LOCKE, THOMAS STARK, individually and on behalf of a class of all persons and entities similarly situated, STEWART ABRAMSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DIRECTV, LLC
COX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv08754
Plaintiff:
ADAM COX
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv01887
Plaintiff:
ADAM COX
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. Diaz
as 3:2019cv05996
Respondent:
Ralph Diaz
Petitioner:
Nicholas Adam Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PEREZ et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03059
Plaintiff:
THELMORE CUMBY, AUSTIN DYER, SETH SOUTHERLAND and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perez et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02024
Plaintiff:
Thelmore Cumby, Austin Dyer, Seth Southerland and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cox et al v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
Adam Cox and Kimberly Cox
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC , Sai Wai and Pyae Maung
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
