Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Carmelo Giuffre v. North American Spine LLC, et al
as 24-2073
Defendant:
NORTH AMERICAN SPINE LLC, PHD, S&D SURGICAL SYSTEMS INC, PHD, WILLIAM L. HIGH, MD, PHD and others
Plaintiff:
CARMELO JOHN GIUFFRE
Martin v. Unknown
as 7:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Cory Adam Martin
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ware v. Boutin et al
as 9:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Khyrel Ware
Defendant:
Boutin, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barraza v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2023cv02436
Plaintiff:
Daniel Barraza
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, Chris Brady, Unknown Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27242
Plaintiff:
ADAM MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv19629
Plaintiff:
ADAM MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15998
Plaintiff:
ADAM MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08036
Plaintiff:
ADAM MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Evenstad v. Ellison et al
as 0:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
Thomas Evenstad
Defendant:
Keith Maurice Ellison, Amy Klobuchar, Mike Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLAY v. MARTIN et al
as 5:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE CLAY
Defendant:
Nurse ADAM MARTIN and CHARLES COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
