Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 50,368
Gonzalez v. Chappell et al
as 3:2024cv02737
Plaintiff: Eric L. Gonzalez
Defendant: Kevin Chappell, Eleanore Adams, Brian Lutz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodstock et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03418
Plaintiff: Shahid Woodstock, Jahiem Smith and Tiffanie Narinesammy
Defendant: The City of New York, Mayor of the City of New York Eric Adams, Deputy Mayor of Public Safety Philip Banks III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brandt v. Cimarron Correctional Facility and Staff, et al
as 24-6089
Plaintiff: DONNA R. BRANDT
Defendant: CIMARRON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND STAFF, TERRACE DICKERSON, Former Warden, FNU GRANTE, Assistance Warden and others
Fredrick Hines v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-1970
Plaintiff: Fredrick Dewayne Hines
Defendant: State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Piens v. Reckard et al
as 4:2024cv04086
Plaintiff: Thola Dean Piens
Defendant: Dr. Justin Reckard, Dr. Syed F. Azam, Dr. Scott A. Gering and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00459
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
MYERS v. CLEVELAND-CLIFFS et al
as 2:2024cv00684
Defendant: CLEVELAND-CLIFFS, UAW - UNITED AUTO WORKERS, AK STEEL and others
Plaintiff: JOE MYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
USA v. Adam Ball
as 24-1407
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ADAM BALL
Deafueh Monbo, et al v. Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc., et al
as 24-7070
Plaintiff: Deafueh Monbo and Juahdi Monbo
Defendant: Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc., Harford Memorial Hospital, Inc., Eskinder Afework, individually and as an employee of Upper Chesapeake Medical Center Inc. and others
In re: Dominique Adams
as 24-172
Petitioner: In re: DOMINIQUE HERMAN ADAMS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?