Cases 61 - 70 of 87
US v. Robert Allen Miller
as 15-4076
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT ALLEN MILLER
Miller v. Colvin
as 1:2015at00030
Plaintiff:
David Allen Miller
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
David Allen Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv00063
Plaintiff:
David Allen Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Miller v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2013cv01927
Plaintiff:
Chris Allen Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miller v. Inyang
as 4:2012cv03695
Plaintiff:
Allen Miller
Defendant:
Victor Inyang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kiefer v. Moran Foods, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00756
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Kiefer, Brian Andrikis, Edward Roach and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
David Pagano
Defendant:
Moran Foods, Inc. doing business as Save A Lot Ltd. and Moran Foods, LLC doing business as Save A Lot Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
MILLER V. MARBERRY ET AL.
as 2:2011cv00262
Nurse:
NURSE HADDIX
Warden:
H. J. MARBERRY
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ALLEN MILLER
Correctional Officer:
CHAPLIN ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Miller v. Marberry et al
as 1:2011cv02367
Plaintiff:
William Allen Miller
Defendant:
H. J. Marberry, Rogers and Haddix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
