Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Barnett v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Caroline S. Barnett
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Federal Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Parker v. Michigan, State of et al
as 5:2024cv10079
Plaintiff:
Bruce Parker
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Matthew Baranski, John Doe and others
Lytle v. Meachum
as 23-50772
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Sean Lytle
Defendant / Appellee:
Amy Clark Meachum, Judge, Ken Paxton, Attorney General, State of Texas and Ken Paxton, Attorney General
Andrews v. Murphy et al
as 1:2023cv00950
Plaintiff:
Dessie Maria Andrews
Defendant:
Tom Murphy, Amy Clark Meachum, Suzanne Covington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lytle v. Meachum
as 1:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sean Lytle
Defendant:
Amy Clark Meachum and Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Clark v. Dexcom, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Amy Clark
Defendant:
Dexcom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Lytle v. Meachum
as 9:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sean Lytle
Defendant:
Amy Clark Meachum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
CLARK v. TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv06469
Plaintiff:
AMY CLARK
Defendant:
TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
In Re:
ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lewis v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Christopher G Lewis
Defendant:
William Hyatte, Mary Lassiter, Jacqueline Scaife and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
