Cases 21 - 30 of 40,212
Stearman v. SCT Operations Inc. et al.
as 1:2024cv00865
Plaintiff:
Jason Stearman
Defendant:
SCT Operations Inc. and Brendan Anderson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Jones v. Nestor Solutions LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01813
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Jones
Defendant:
Nestor Solutions LLC, Sandy Dasigenis, Jeff Leva and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor:
TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
Williams, Lee A. v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv21879
Plaintiff:
Lee Andrew Williams
Defendant:
J. Lee, T. Anderson, Officer Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryricka Custis v. David Anderson
as 24-6464
Petitioner:
RYRICKA NIKITA CUSTIS
Respondent:
DAVID ANDERSON
Anderson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02366
Plaintiff:
Shari Anderson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anderson v. AFAM CONCEPT, INC., et al
as 1:2024cv03877
Plaintiff:
Ladene Anderson
Defendant:
AFAM CONCEPT, INC., doing business as JF Labs, Inc., Avlon Industries, Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anderson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Travis Edward Anderson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bibb v. Anderson Merchandisers, LLC
as 4:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Malynda Bibb
Defendant:
Anderson Merchandisers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
