Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Jackson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2023cv00187
Petitioner:
Andre Jackson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson-El v. Lumpkin
as 23-50813
Petitioner / Appellant:
Andre Jackson-El
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
McCLAIN v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2023cv04012
Plaintiff:
MARTINA WHITE, RALPH MCCLAIN, SHAWN WHITE and others
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ANGELUCCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2023cv24086
Plaintiff:
ANDRE JACKSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson #622337 v. Surety et al
as 2:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Andre Jackson #622337
Defendant:
Unknown Surety, Unknown Bensel, A. Hetrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3348
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JACKSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2023cv00922
Plaintiff:
ANDRE JACKSON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DONALD GREEN and AFAM ISHAKWUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. United States Of America
as 6:2023cv00019
Petitioner:
Andre Jackson
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
USA v. Andre Jackson
as 23-1170
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDRE JACKSON
Bagozzi v. Community Outreach for Psychiatric Emergencies et al
as 2:2023cv10286
Plaintiff:
Linda Bagozzi
Defendant:
Community Outreach for Psychiatric Emergencies, Hegira Health, INC, Victor Vigo Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
