Cases 1 - 10 of 25
ARNOLD v. BRADFORD et al
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F. ARNOLD, JR.
Defendant:
DANIELLE BRADFORD, TAYLOR BAUGH, JEFFREY PEASE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramirez v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv01470
Plaintiff:
Steve Andrew Ramirez
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1.71 Acres of Land, More or Less et al
as 7:2021cv00366
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
1.71 Acres of Land, More or Less, Elva Rosa R. Hinojosa, Alicia T. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Quiroz et al v. Pineda et al
as 1:2021cv00443
Plaintiff:
E. F. Q., Jasmine Quiroz, Enrique Quiroz and others
Defendant:
Spencer Hanna, CITY OF AUSTIN and Eduardo Pineda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Ramirez
as 21-50303
Defendant / Appellant:
Jason Ramirez, also known as Jose Raul Ramirez, also known as Jason Andrew Ramirez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Ramirez v. McElroy Truck Lines, Inc et al
as 2:2016cv00494
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ramirez
Defendant:
McElroy Truck Lines, Inc and Ivy Paul Speight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez v. Stephens
as 4:2014cv02134
Petitioner:
Andrew Ramirez Martinez
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Andrew Ramirez v. Bridgestone Retail Operation
as 13-1605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW RAMIREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIDGESTONE RETAIL OPERATIONS LLC
Ramirez v. Mirnda et al
as 2:2013cv00600
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ramirez
Defendant:
P. A. Mirnda, D. Royston, Santana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv08554
Plaintiff:
Gayle Andrews Ramirez and Joe Ramirez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
