Cases 11 - 20 of 90
Yensco v. NIBCO, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00469
Plaintiff:
Andrew Yensco
Defendant:
NIBCO, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Conod v. UPS, Co. et al
as 6:2022cv01041
Plaintiff:
John Conod
Defendant:
UPS, Co. a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as United Parcel Service, Andrew Sokolowski and Lee Longacre
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Jackson v. R&R Tool, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jackson
Defendant:
R&R Tool, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Andrew Albert v. Pierce Manufacturing, Incorporated
as 22-1246
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW ALBERT
Defendant / Appellee:
PIERCE MANUFACTURING, INCORPORATED
Perez v. Building Futures et al
as 1:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Margarita E Perez
Defendant:
Building Futures and Andrew L. Cortes
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Jackson v. South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services
as 3:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jackson
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Roark v. CT Group, LLC
as 3:2021cv00676
Plaintiff:
Andrew Roark
Defendant:
CT Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fm Removal - Family and Medical Leave Act
Coleman et al v. Ark Contracting Services, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv02553
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Coleman and Natasha Coleman
Defendant:
Ark Contracting Services LLC, Michael Nesuda doing business as Nesuda Inc, Andrew Waldron and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Oliver v. Roehm America, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01831
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Oliver
Defendant:
Roehm America, LLC, Yolanda Brown and Andrew Stillufsen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Stephens v. Titan America LLC
as 3:2021cv00910
Plaintiff:
Andrew Stephens
Defendant:
Titan America LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
