Cases 1 - 10 of 12
SPENCE v. PANAMA CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 5:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY SPENCE
Defendant:
PANAMA CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, ELDERLY AND AGING, PAN CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00327
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SPENCE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv13995
Petitioner:
ANTHONY SPENCE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Spence v. Crawford
as 1:2021cv00833
Petitioner:
George Anthony Spence
Respondent:
Jeffrey Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SPENCE v. RENN et al
as 1:2017cv00881
Petitioner:
Levar Lee Anthony Spence
Respondent:
Thomas L. Mcginley, The District Attorney of the County of York and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SPENCE v. RENN et al
as 2:2016cv05710
Petitioner:
LEVAR LEE ANTHONY SPENCE
Respondent:
RICHARD K. RENN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE , SETH F. BORTNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spence v. York County Prision
as 1:2015cv14036
Petitioner:
Levar Lee Anthony Spence
Respondent:
York County Prision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spence v. York County Prison et al
as 1:2015cv02290
Petitioner:
Levar Lee Anthony Spence
Respondent:
York County Prison and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
US Bank National Association v. Spence
as 4:2013cv00245
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
Defendant:
Anthony Spence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
USA v. Anthony Spence
as 13-1395
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY SPENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
