Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Paynes v. Woods
as 24-30148
Plaintiff:
Ivory Paynes
Defendant:
Gloria Woods, professionally known as GloRilla, Antonio Anderson, Jr., professionally known as Macaroni Toni, UMG Recordings, Incorporated and others
ANDERSON v. LAWSON et al
as 1:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO ANDERSON
Defendant:
K LAWSON, J PERDUE and C WOODLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv19140
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO ANDERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Paynes v. Woods et al
as 2:2023cv01308
Plaintiff:
Ivory Paynes
Defendant:
Gloria Woods, Antonio Anderson, Jr, Universal Music Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Anderson v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv02417
Plaintiff:
Antonio Anderson
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, United States Marshal Service, Bennett Echols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Saul
as 8:2021cv00438
Plaintiff:
Antonio Anderson
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv65667
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv01751
Petitioner:
Justin Antonio Anderson
Respondent:
The State of California, California Department of Corrections, Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Logelfo
as 5:2018ct03176
Plaintiff:
Antonio Anderson
Defendant:
John Logelfo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
