Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Robinson v. Carter
as 1:2023cv00145
Petitioner:
Demetric Antonio Robinson
Respondent:
Karen Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Gjuraj
as 21-358
Defendant:
Mike Peters, Dondon Fletcher, AKA Yellow, David Karp and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Isni Gjuraj
Robinson v. USA
as 8:2020cv00496
Petitioner:
Antonio Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ROBINSON v. PHILBIN et al
as 4:2019cv00209
Petitioner:
ANTONIO ROBINSON
Respondent:
Warden WALTER BERRY and Warden EDWARD PHILBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bookhardt et al v. Associated Wholesale Grocers Inc
as 2:2019cv13894
Plaintiff:
Ward Gonzalez, Paul Weathersby, William J. Bobbitt, III and others
Defendant:
Associated Wholesale Grocers Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Robinson v. Baker et al
as 2:2019cv12219
Defendant:
Floyd Baker, Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc. and Associated Wholesale Grocers Inc
Plaintiff:
Antonio Robinson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Antonio Robinson v. Commissioner, Georgia DOC, et al
as 18-11284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WARDEN
Piazza v. Associated Wholesale Grocers Inc.
as 2:2017cv10289
Defendant:
Associated Wholesale Grocers Inc
Plaintiff:
Michael Piazza, Jr. , Robert Hammitt, III , Chance L. Pichon and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216
Moody v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc.
as 2:2017cv10290
Plaintiff:
De'on Moody , Keith Ingraham , Scott Kinley and others
Defendant:
Associated Wholesale Grocers Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216
Robinson v. The Utilization Department et al
as 5:2017ct03171
Plaintiff:
Michael Antonio Robinson
Defendant:
The Utilization Department, Paula Smith and Dr. Devaul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
