Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Nathan Carroll v. Northampton Restaurants, Inc.
as 24-1354
Plaintiff:
NATHAN E. CARROLL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, GERALDINE P. CORRIGAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, CRYSTAL A. BATEMAN and others
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON RESTAURANTS, INC., d/b/a Aberdeen Barn Steakhouse
Hill et al v. Kemper Corporation
as 6:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Ashley Hill and Anali De Jesus
Defendant:
Kemper Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2102 Notice Required Before Plant Closings and Mass Layoffs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Verduzco v. Sugar Hill Ranch LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01661
Plaintiff:
Luis Verduzco
Defendant:
Sugar Hill Ranch LLC, Ashley Hill, Unknown Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Hill v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02460
Plaintiff:
Ashley Hill
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Ashley Hill
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hill v. Imperial Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, et al
as 2:2020cv00097
Defendant:
James River Insurance Company, Imperial Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Victor Amanuel Aguilar Flores
Plaintiff:
Ashley Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHATTUCK v. ANDERSON et al
as 2:2019cv00428
Defendant:
MIKE ANDERSON, JERRAD PIRTLE, ASHLEY HILL and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES SHATTUCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
