Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Robinson v. Lewis
as 4:2017cv00004
Petitioner:
Aaron Robinson
Respondent:
Jason Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dayley v. USA et al
as 2:2016cv00249
Plaintiff:
Jared K. Dayley
Defendant:
USA, Marie Y. Shelton and Aaron Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Hohlt et al v. Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
as 6:2014cv06154
Plaintiff:
Sean Hohlt , Aaron Robinson , Robert Heaney and others
Defendant:
Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hohlt et al v. Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00003
Plaintiff:
Sean Hohlt , Aaron Robinson and Robert Heaney
Defendant:
Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hohlt et al v. Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00098
Plaintiff:
Sean Hohlt , Aaron Robinson , Robert Heaney and others
Defendant:
Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Robinson v. Miller et al
as 3:2013cv00970
Plaintiff:
Keith Aaron Robinson
Defendant:
Amy Miller, Ken Phillips, Posner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. LANCASTER COUNTY PROSECUTOR et al
as 5:2013cv01261
Plaintiff:
AARON ROBINSON
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY PROSECUTOR, CHRISTOPHER LARSEN, LANCASTER CITY POLICE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOODNIGHT v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2013cv00085
Plaintiff:
THOMAS GOODNIGHT
Defendant:
MCSD MARION COUNTY SEX REGISTRY DEPARTMENT and AARON ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Honorable Judge Edgar G. Walker et al
as 1:2012cv05382
Plaintiff:
Aaron Robinson
Defendant:
Honorable Judge Edgar G. Walker, Honorable Judge Boyle, Honorable Judge McGuire and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2009cv03696
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AARON ROBINSON, DARNELL TOLIVER and PREMIUM MEDICAL CARE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
