Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Davis v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01474
Plaintiff:
Adam Davis
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Davis v.Concentrix CVG Customer Management Group, Inc.
as 6:2023cv01942
Plaintiff:
ADAM DAVIS
Defendant:
CONCENTRIX CVG CUSTOMER MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. and Concentrix CVG Customer Managment Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Blain et al v. California Department of Transportation et al
as 3:2022cv04178
Plaintiff:
Jackson Blain, John Janosko, Kellie Castillo and others
Defendant:
Governor Gavin Newsom, County of Alameda, California Department of Transportation, Toks Omishakin, Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Reliance First Capital, LLC
as 7:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Adam Davis
Defendant:
Reliance First Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv59881
Plaintiff:
ADAM DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. NUU Mobile
as 4:2021cv00701
Plaintiff:
Adam Davis
Defendant:
NUU Mobile
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv42350
Plaintiff:
ADAM DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riley v. Hagler et al
as 3:2020cv00400
Defendant:
Arlene Clements, Caleb Humphrey, Luther Hagler and others
Plaintiff:
DeVante Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCuiston v. Hagler et al
as 3:2020cv00399
Defendant:
Caleb Humphrey, Arlene Clements, Luther Hagler and others
Plaintiff:
Donovan McCuiston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ezell v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv01322
Plaintiff:
Adam Davis Ezell and Adam Daywone Ezell
Defendant:
Psych Busch, Nurse Block, Lt Brosch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
