Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 78
USA v. Adam Scott
as 23-2769
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ADAM SCOTT
Leiva v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00083
Petitioner: Adam Scott Leiva
Respondent: United States of America
Interested Party: Mark C Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Crapo v. City of Brownsville et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00119
Petitioner: Adam Scott Crapo
Respondent: City of Brownsville and Cameron County, et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. US Department of Justice
as 1:2023cv00363
Petitioner: Adam Scott
Respondent: US Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Branch #278745 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv01442
Petitioner: Adam Scott Branch
Respondent: Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adam Branch v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16930
Petitioner / Appellant: ADAM SCOTT BRANCH
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Odom et al v. Buckner et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00673
Plaintiff: Joshua Odom, Candace Odom and K. J. O.
Defendant: Nancy Buckner, Marilyn Colson, Vatesha Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Adam Scott
as 22-3089
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ADAM SCOTT
USA v. Adam Scott
as 22-2805
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ADAM SCOTT
Branch #278745 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01596
Petitioner: Adam Scott Branch
Respondent: David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?