Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 81
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. v. 189.9 rods in Twsp. 149, et al
as 24-1693
Plaintiff: WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
Defendant: 189.9 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 W Section 11: W1/2SE1/4 Section 14: NW1/4NE1/4 McKenzie County, North Dakota, An easement and right-of-way across, 227.8 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 W Section 11: N1/2SW1/4, W1/2SE1/4, McKenzie County, North Dakota, An easement and right-of-way across, 242.0 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 W Section 2: SW1/4SE1/4 Section 11: NE1/4, McKenzie County, North Dakota, An easement and right-of-way across and others
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. v. 3.02 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: NW/4 et al
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff: WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
Defendant: 3.02 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: NW/4, 2.92 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: N/2SW/4, 1.45 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: S/2SW/4 with exception and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
William Fly v. United States, et al
as 24-1566
Plaintiff: William Anthony Fly, also known as Tony Fly, also known as Toni Fly
Defendant: United States, United States Department of Justice, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Jon Kean v. Stott, et al
as 24-1209
Plaintiff: JON PAUL KEAN
Defendant: CORRECTIONS OFFICER STOTT, personal and official capacity, CORRECTIONS OFFICER OLSON, personal and official capacity, CORRECTIONS OFFICER GODELL, personal and official capacity and others
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Washava Moye
as 23-2289
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD, MPH
Defendant / Appellee: WASHAVA MOYE, officially as Interim Director of Alvin S. Glen Detention Center ("ASGDC") for injunctive relief and declaratory relief, and individually for damages, SPECIFIC EMPLOYEES OF ASGDC, who negligently and/or intentionally injured plaintiff, individually for damages, RICHLAND COUNTY, ("RC"), SC, for damages and others
BROWN v. CITY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2023cv23075
Plaintiff: DAVID BROWN
Defendant: CITY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, POLICE OFFICER A. BENAVENTE, POLICE OFFICER O. RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frankenfield v. Galveston County Jail et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00100
Plaintiff: Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant: Galveston County Jail, and all others unkown and and all others unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Selvin Carranza, et al v. Janine K. Jeffery, et al
as 23-55180
Plaintiff / Appellee: SELVIN ORLANDO CARRANZA
Appellant: JANINE K. JEFFERY
Defendant / Appellee: WILLIAM SUGLICH, Chairperson Chief Deputy Warden (A) for Richard J. Donovan (RJD), ALAN HERNANDEZ, Associate Warden (AW) for Richard J. Donovan (RJD), EDWARD GARCIA, CCPOA Representative/Correctional Captain at RJ Donovan and others
Defendant: EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, MATTHEW CATE, Secretary for CDCR, JEFFREY A. BEARD, Secretary for CDCR and others
Boles v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00113
Plaintiff: Prentis Boles
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company, National Mediation Board, Michael Buttry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Washava Moye
as 22-7343
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant / Appellee: DONALD JOHN ZELENKA, officially as Deputy Attorney General of South Carolina ("SCAG") and as Chief of SCAG's office's Criminal Division, officially for declaratory and injunctive relief, and individually for damages, ALL OTHER UNKNOWN-NAMES PERSONS, who injured and/or conspired to injured Plaintiff, SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, individually for damages and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?