Cases 1 - 10 of 100
BLACK v. USA
as 1:2026cv00556
Petitioner:
LORD SHAHKI ALLAH BLACK
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Solomon King Solomon Seals-Allah v. All Churches of the State and the Social Community within the whole State of Missouri
as 4:2026cv00945
Plaintiff:
King Solomon Seals-Allah
Defendant:
All Churches of the State and the Social Community within the whole State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allah Allah v. Genisys Credit Union, et al
as 26-1453
Plaintiff:
ALLAH GREATMIND ALLAH, dba Greatmind Enterprise
Defendant:
GENISYS CREDIT UNION, NATHAN DAVIDSON, CFO and BRIAN DOWGIALLO, Risk Management VP
Asiatic Allah v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2026cv03883
Plaintiff:
Infinite Shakim Asiatic Allah
Defendant:
City Of New York, Jeremiah Aviles, Jerel Castma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00970
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United States of America v. Coston
as 26-2679
Defendant:
EDWIN RANDAL COSTON, Allah and Allah Allah
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ALLAH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2026cv03899
Plaintiff:
SABIR HERU ALLAH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allah v. SRT?Motors Dealership Mr. Hash
as 26-895
Plaintiff:
WAMEL ALLAH
Defendant:
SRTMotors Dealership Mr. HASH, GWC WARRANTY COMPANY and WESTERN FUNDING INCORPORATED BANK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
